Blind Follower

this blog is for reference only.
Regarding the debate between Mensrightsmovement.net and the New York times.
on the topic of "Female Only" buses.

Okay, here's the situation:

I read an article in the New York Times which discussed a
specific event brought forth by 'Extremist Groups'.

a) It's obviously common for "Activists" to push their ideas upon us,
on a routine basis.

b) And, as usual, these newspapers commend her actions.
In fact, the media always directs their attention toward women,
for some reason or another.

c) IT doesn't matter which topic abounds on any given day.

d) Our news-reporters will inevitably show their support for her.

e) And, all too often, the articles contradict one another, as well.
Now, here are a few examples:

1) Femme groups claimed that the S.A.T.'s were biased since boys score
higher than girls.

2) They said that our school-teachers favor boys, thus it's necessary to
create an all-girls classroom
(and the media actually accepted this hair-brained idea.
Plus, you gotta wonder how "Extremist groups" can force public-schools to
formulate this idea.)

3) Newspapers also said that, "Girls are smarter than boys, because she
performs much better at school".
(Even though, they had already established otherwise when
claiming that our teachers are biased against girls).

4)They always talk about "Woman's Health". But somehow managed to
say that our Hospitals deny fair treatment for women.
And our newspapers blindly agreed with this idea.

5)They claimed that girls feel more comfortable when not in the
presence of boys.

6) But then, they also integrated "co-ed" gymnastics class.

7) The media supported the YWCA's decision to exclude males from
their management team.

8) There was the case of Wal-mart supposedly being unfair to women.
And ironically, hundreds of female journalists wasted an entire year
covering this story from start to finish.

(On a personal note: I'm a small business owner, and we often got sued by
lawyers who know how to work the system. And they're able to win any case.
mainly because our courts are likely to Judge in favor of the woman.
Plus, there's no penalty for falsely accusing. SO, there's nothing to
lose. This is why women are constantly suing employers.)

8b) Amazingly, the media has also taken positions in favor of
discriminatory corporate hiring practices which legally
favor women.

8c) We're all aware of those government grants, as well.

9) The media also pushed for allowing women to walk
into men's bathrooms, and what-have-you.
So, now, I'm never truly safe from harms way.
(on a personal note: I've been inside rest-rooms, on several occasions.
To which case, female cleaning personnel have walked inside, without even bothering
to knock ...-or bothering to wait- ...or give courtesy.
Or perhaps, they could enter my rest room, while at-least, giving a brief verbal gesture.


9b) They've given court orders which allow females access anywhere, whether in his shower
stall, or, even inside his toilet. She needn't provide an explanation, and cameras, as well as
video transmissions are wholly permitted.
(They've clearly established the most drastic indignities imaginable. And, it sees no boundaries.)



.10) Also, the media can change their story on-a-dime.

11) They created a big-hype when an adolescent girl sued the
boy-scouts.

12) But then, suddenly, the media began praising 'The Girls Clubs',
"Girls Scouts", "Girls, Inc." and what-have-you.

13) They claimed that girls have a low self-esteem, even though
girls always terrorize boys.

14) Then, when the "Hill-Thomas" incident occurred, they suddenly
acted like it was a large-scale serious issue.
Thus, giving boys a low self-esteem.

15) All the while, those abusive & highly discriminatory Women's talk-shows
(magazines, etc.) are routinely taking place right in front of their eyes.

16) There's too many examples of media bias to begin listing.

17) They've made ridiculous claims that teenage girls are much better at
web-designing than boys.

18) Girls are said to be smarter in every possible way.

19)Plus, in contrast, girls are said to be the victims, as well.

20) Everyday, they're always some degree of bias suggesting that
women have some sort of special abilities which men are lacking thereof

20b) (Extra Sensory Perception, brain function,
Women's Intuition, Maternal Instinct, Language Skills,
having a better psychological understanding of others, etc.).


21) THey proudly proclaim that women are more advanced,

22) but still supported an evolutionary theory
which supposedly proves that women are more primitive.

23)(In other words: the media tries to say EVERYTHING.
You can't possibly support the Eve-theory, yet still claim
attributes becoming of a more advanced people. One idea
contradicts the other.)

24) They claim that women are better than men in every possible way,
yet also declare that it's wrong to 'stereotype against women'.

25) Femme groups have often incorporated new ideas into their repertoire, which
routinely defies previous campaigns.
Including claims that women are sexually repressed, while prohibiting men from
even daring to glance at a woman.

26) Also, the media somehow includes the most outlandish ideas imaginable.
For example: Claiming that every woman actually seems alot younger after
reaching the age of 50 (YEA, RIGHT.)

Should I continue, or do you get the message?

27) The media is totally unfair against men.

28) Women receive helpful advice pertaining to various subjects, such as,
money-management.

NOW, these factors considered:
The New York Times decided to cover a story pertaining to
"Woman-Only Buses" in Mexico.
And, needless-to-say, the Journalists took a favorable position to this idea.



So, I wrote an angry-letter to them, from a very unique
perspective. Instead of merely focusing upon this particular event,
I began focusing upon the BROADER issue.
Instead of merely debating this specific subject.



********************



LETTER TO THE N.Y. TIMES



********************







"Regarding the transportation system which only permits women:

This article is SICK. we're looking at discrimination comparable to
1950's segregation in deep-south USA. But I'm not
gonna waste my time discussing this particular issue.
rather instead, let's take the broader
approach. Please try to follow closely. The media is
always biased against men. [Do you understand?]
SO, When this particular article dies down, there'll soon
be another which takes its place. [Do you understand?]

Nearly every single day, we can observe countless stories
which totally revolve around women.

It's basically a 100% rout. Total sexism, total inequality,
total female-chauvinism. Do you get the picture, buddy?

Now, let me ask: What will TOMORROW bring? You'll find
some other way to torment men. Let's also reflect
upon yesterday's female-centric headlines. There's too many
to mention. But here, now, and today, this newspaper gives
blind-support toward the latest issue. And, just as
always, you claim valid reason for supporting this
particular story.





Okay, now let's examine the transportation which only
allows female passengers. It's typical for a Woman's-Group
to raise their voice. And for this very reason, their
demands are acknowledged. Why should the News-Media justify
her actions, just because Extremist-groups have legal power ?

It's comparable to every-other campaign which receives
wide-scale attention from the media. Without exception,
everything is recognized as a fact. Our media is being
controlled by irresponsible journalists who can fabricate
their own news.

Okay, let's get back to the issue at hand. Mexican males
are very polite and somewhat passive in behavior.
Either way, your allegations that men actually "deserve" to be excluded
is yet another form of sexist stereotyping against men.
Also, it just so happens, Journalists react negatively to
"segregated busing" in Iran.



So, what exactly do you stand for? (OKAY, I shouldn't have
written that-- dh). It doesn't matter. The fact is: You
have no right to incorporate your personal belief system
into this article. I strongly believe that, this type of
unprofessional journalism should be regarded as
discrimination. And all guilty parties should be forcibly
removed from their position. Do you understand?

I'm aware, many journalists claim a constitutional right
to freedom-of-the- press. However, there is a loop-hole
with that idea. This allows you to display bias in everyday
media-coverage.
However, Poor Ethics on your part constitutes discrimination.

Today, we're discussing the "Female-Only" bus system.
This issue was conspired by activists. And they happened
to be the same group-of-women responsible for many previous
campaigns. In fact, they ALWAYS lobby to push their ideas
into law. (Personal note: I was traveling is Asia, and the
Femme groups had placed cloth banners in government
buildings. Plus, they would disperse literature when
everyone was boarding a cruise-ship)


And, AS ALWAYS, the media gives full support, before
ever hearing the story. But, please look beyond this
current issue. Instead, consider the inevitable campaigns
which will reach our newspapers sometime in the near future.
Perhaps, four months from now, there will be several dozen
more incidents of a similar nature. Today's article will
soon be forgotten.

……And this particular issue will drift into the pages……
only to be replaced by another. -The end.



(On a personal note: I foresee the day when it becomes
a crime to display this type of bias. However, our
'anti-discrimination' laws should already protect me
from your wrath. In blunt terms: people who write garbage
should be fired!)



-------------------------------------------

www.nytimes.com, click on one

***********************************



The N.Y. Times Editor Responds to my post,
in one simple sentence:
"Thanks for sending along your info"

************************************









..tr>..table>

.. -->[if gte vml 1]> ..[end